Objective

To compare the treatment efficiency, quality of outcome and patient satisfaction of the Damon SL System with conventional brackets and ligating methods.

Methodology

A total of 215 patients were treated at three different sites — one university and two private practices. Out of those patients, 108 were treated with the Damon System and 107 with conventional braces. Damon and non-Damon treatments were analyzed for frequency of appointments, treatment duration and quality of treatment outcome as determined by the ABO grading criteria. Additionally, patients in both groups were surveyed to assess their level of satisfaction with their treatment.

Results

  • Damon patients were treated in an average of 6.33 months less time than those treated with conventional twin brackets.
  • Damon patients were treated with 7 fewer appointments than those treated with conventional braces.
  • The ABO scores of the Damon group were significantly higher (7.38 mean) than those treated with conventional braces.
  • Patients treated with the Damon System reported greater satisfaction with their treatment.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the Damon System yields significantly faster, better and more reproducible treatment results and that patient satisfaction with the Damon System is greater than with conventional braces.

Treatment Time and Standard Deviation

Treatment Time and Standard Deviation

ABO Scores and Standard Deviation

ABO Scores and Standard Deviation

Treatment Times

Treatment Times

Number Of Appointments

Number Of Appointments